let G be AddGroup; :: thesis: ( dom (ID G) = G & cod (ID G) = G & ( for f being strict GroupMorphism st cod f = G holds
(ID G) * f = f ) & ( for g being strict GroupMorphism st dom g = G holds
g * (ID G) = g ) )
set i = ID G;
thus dom (ID G) = G ; :: thesis: ( cod (ID G) = G & ( for f being strict GroupMorphism st cod f = G holds
(ID G) * f = f ) & ( for g being strict GroupMorphism st dom g = G holds
g * (ID G) = g ) )
thus cod (ID G) = G ; :: thesis: ( ( for f being strict GroupMorphism st cod f = G holds
(ID G) * f = f ) & ( for g being strict GroupMorphism st dom g = G holds
g * (ID G) = g ) )
thus for f being strict GroupMorphism st cod f = G holds
(ID G) * f = f :: thesis: for g being strict GroupMorphism st dom g = G holds
g * (ID G) = g
proof
let f be strict GroupMorphism; :: thesis: ( cod f = G implies (ID G) * f = f )
assume A1: cod f = G ; :: thesis: (ID G) * f = f
set H = dom f;
reconsider f9 = f as Morphism of dom f,G by A1, Def12;
consider m being Function of (dom f),G such that
A2: f9 = GroupMorphismStr(# (dom f),G,m #) by Th13;
( dom (ID G) = G & (id G) * m = m ) by FUNCT_2:17;
hence (ID G) * f = f by A1, A2, Def14; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus for g being strict GroupMorphism st dom g = G holds
g * (ID G) = g :: thesis: verum
proof
let f be strict GroupMorphism; :: thesis: ( dom f = G implies f * (ID G) = f )
assume A3: dom f = G ; :: thesis: f * (ID G) = f
set H = cod f;
reconsider f9 = f as Morphism of G, cod f by A3, Def12;
consider m being Function of G,(cod f) such that
A4: f9 = GroupMorphismStr(# G,(cod f),m #) by Th13;
( cod (ID G) = G & m * (id G) = m ) by FUNCT_2:17;
hence f * (ID G) = f by A3, A4, Def14; :: thesis: verum
end;